The choice of piling method is a fundamental decision in deep foundation design, affecting both structural performance and project cost. Different types of piling methods exist to accommodate varying soil conditions, load requirements, and site constraints. While driven piles are widely known, bored piles—or drilled shafts—represent a versatile and increasingly preferred solution for projects where noise, vibration, or urban site limitations are critical. Understanding the distinctions among piling methods helps engineers and developers select the most efficient and cost-effective foundation solution.
Table of Contents
Driven Piles: A benchmark in piling methods
Among different types of piling methods, driven piles are perhaps the most recognized. They involve hammering or vibrating precast concrete, steel, or timber piles into the ground. Driven piles provide predictable load capacity and rapid installation under suitable conditions. However, their application can be limited by noise, vibration, or space constraints—factors that often direct project planners toward bored pile solutions.
Bored piles: The focus of modern piling methods
Bored piles, also known as drilled shafts, play a central role in different types of piling methods, particularly in urban or sensitive environments. Unlike driven piles, bored piles are created by excavating a cylindrical hole into the ground and filling it with reinforced concrete. This method significantly reduces noise and vibration, allowing construction near existing buildings and infrastructure.
Several variations of bored pile installation exist:
Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) piles: Soil is removed using a hollow auger, and concrete is injected under pressure while withdrawing the auger. This technique is fast, cost-effective, and widely used for medium-load applications.
Kelly or rotary bored piles: Heavy-duty rotary drilling rigs create deep shafts in stiff or hard soils, often equipped with temporary casing or bentonite slurry to stabilize the excavation.
Slurry-supported bored piles: In very soft or water-saturated soils, drilling fluid (bentonite or polymer slurry) stabilizes the excavation until concrete is poured, ensuring verticality and load-bearing capacity.
Each of these bored pile techniques illustrates the adaptability of this method within different types of piling methods, offering options that balance cost, installation speed, and soil-specific challenges.
Micro piles and other specialized piling methods
Beyond driven and bored piles, different types of piling methods include micropiles, screw piles, and sheet pile walls. Micropiles are small-diameter, high-capacity elements suitable for restricted-access sites or underpinning works. Screw piles are mechanically installed, providing rapid deployment in certain soil types. While these methods have niche applications, bored piles generally dominate in projects requiring large load capacities and urban-friendly construction.
Economic and practical considerations in different types of piling methods
Selecting the right piling method has direct implications for cost, schedule, and project feasibility. Bored piles often reduce mitigation costs associated with noise and vibration, while allowing precise control over depth and diameter—factors that strongly influence the overall project budget. Comparing different types of piling methods, engineers frequently find that bored piles provide the optimal balance of performance, flexibility, and cost-efficiency for complex or sensitive construction sites.
Pile processing
Understanding the range of different types of piling methods clarifies which solution fits a given site. Once bored piles are installed, they undergo further processing to ensure structural integration, such as leveling, reinforcement adjustment, and pile head treatment. This post-installation work marks the next critical step in achieving the full potential of bored pile foundations.
Pile breaking with Brextor®
With the patented Brextor® milling process the dismantling force is under control at all times. The core and surface tension is broken in a single work step. But that’s not all! Brextor® contributes to efficient and sustainable pile head processing:
🏗 Increased construction quality
Perfectly finished piles without cracks in the pile body or spalling on the pile skin, no bent or torn reinforcements and a height accuracy of +/- 1 cm.
💵 Reduced construction costs
The demolition material consists of 80% gravel 0-30mm and can therefore be reused directly on the construction site. In addition, Brextor® requires less working space than conventional mining methods. This means that not only expenses for transportation and disposal incl. fees are saved, but the purchase and supply of replacement material is also eliminated. Furthermore, the preparatory work eliminates the need for a separating diamand cut at the final extraction level and the cleaning effort is massively lower than with conventional extraction methods.
⏱ Shortened processing time
A pile, e.g. with a diameter of 1 m and a removal height of of 1m can be processed within 40 minutes. Thus a Daily output of up to 16 piles possible. With Brextor® you also get a reliable performance and therefore increased planning security.
♻️Environmentally friendly
With Brextor®, the demolition material (80% gravel 0-30mm) can be reused directly on the construction site. Brextor® also requires less working space. This saves excavation and replacement material. By reusing the demolition material directly on the construction site and saving on excavation and replacement material, transportation can be saved. In addition, landfills are less polluted.
👷Increased health & safety at work
No heavy physical labor is required for pile processing, which massively reduces the risk of health hazards such as HAVS syndrome. Brextor® also avoids working in danger zones.
Interested? Our team is happy to help: +41 41 495 05 20